Is it wrong to be only slightly happy for someone getting their best time at swimming when it meant they beat you for the first time ever? I feel conflicted. One of the other participants in my swimming class has always been quite a bit slower than all the rest of us. He's out trying his hardest and that's great in itself. I'm not trying to sound pompous or 'better' than him, but you kind of get used to the person that always needs their own half of the lane because they're slower.
Well, tonight I was paired up with him for our beginning of the winter session time-trials (serves me right since I haven't swam in over a month!). The first 3 x 100m sets I beat him no problem, even though I was clocking in at some of my worst times yet. (At this point I'm just blaming everything on my planters wart...) Then we had 3 x 50m sets. The second 50m he decides to literally give it his all and beat me by 4 or 5 seconds! I couldn't believe it. I saw him pull ahead and I didn't have an ounce of umph left to even catch up... Maybe I was slacking because he hadn't been that much of a challenge.
Our coach was so excited for him, understandably, and he was excited, as I would have been if it had been me! - but I could barely muster a 'great job'. Is that bad? I was feeling so defeated - but I tell ya, I was hell-bent on whopping his butt on our last 50m sprint!! I guess that's the up side to competition, it's the driving force behind improvement. I'm happy to report our last 50m sprint I was able to beat my fellow swimmer, and he even did BETTER than his time before! That time I was full of praise for him and secretly smiling for me.